Explore how better UI/UX in Web3 can reduce friction, build trust, and boost adoption by guiding users through wallets, gas fees, and new flows.
According to a study over 75% of new users on DeFi platforms abandon the process before completing a transaction, and more than half drop off at the wallet connection stage. These aren’t just usability issues, they’re signs of a deeper problem in how Web3 products are designed.
Unlike Web2, where users are familiar with email logins, one-click payments, and intuitive flows, Web3 introduces complex concepts like wallet connections, gas fees, and transaction signing, all of which are foreign to the average user. This makes UI and UX design in Web3 not just important, but essential for growth.
In this blog, we’ll explore what UI/UX design means in the context of Web3, the common mistakes teams keep repeating, and what forward-thinking products are doing to get it right.
UI and UX design in Web3 is about making complex blockchain interactions feel simple, safe, and familiar. While UI (User Interface) focuses on how things look, buttons, forms, navigation, UX (User Experience) is what makes a dApp usable, trustworthy, and worth returning to.
In Web3, where users are often asked to sign transactions, manage wallets, or understand tokens, good design becomes more than polish, it becomes essential for comprehension and safety. The design has to reduce fear, not create more of it.
Unlike Web2, where most users are already familiar with email logins or card payments, Web3 adds new friction points: wallet connections, gas fees, DAOs, networks. If the design doesn’t guide users through those steps clearly, most of them will bounce before even reaching the core product.
That’s why Web3 UX has to be sharper, it’s not just about delighting users, it’s about helping them survive a new environment they don’t yet understand.
Most users never make it past your connect wallet screen. They drop off before they mint, trade, vote, or post. Not because they don’t care but because they’re confused, hesitant, or simply stuck.
Most Web3 products today are still designed for insiders. You see it in the way wallet prompts interrupt onboarding. You see it in the assumption that users understand phrases like “sign this transaction” or “approve contract access.”
Founders and designers are chasing decentralization, not usability. That’s fair when you’re shipping protocols. But when you’re building interfaces, the expectation changes. Users don’t care about your infrastructure. They care about what they can do, how quickly they can do it, and whether it makes sense the first time they try.
You still see teams building for the Web2 mental model. Linear flows. Clean UI. Login with Google, and you’re in. But Web3 doesn’t work like that, yet the design still assumes it should. That’s where the disconnect happens.
Here’s what we know:
Even the most well-funded Web3 teams keep falling into the same traps. These aren’t edge-case bugs, they’re core UX flaws that turn away users before they even try your product.
Words like “wallet,” “DAO,” and “gas fees” flood your homepage before users even know what your product does. For crypto natives, it’s fine. For everyone else, it’s a wall.
Web3 teams often forget: jargon feels like a locked door. It signals, “This isn’t for you.”
You don’t have to dumb things down, you need to time them better. Use progressive disclosure. Show the essentials first. Let users explore and surface complexity when it matters.
Fix it:
Here’s the reality: most dApps ask users to complete 3–5 crypto-native actions before they can use the product.
That’s a lot for someone who just wanted to test a tool.
Compare this to Uniswap: you land on the site, pick tokens, then it prompts you to connect. The product leads; the crypto comes after.
Fix it:
When things break in Web3, they usually break quietly.
No error message. No loader. No fallback. Just... nothing happens.
For users, silence feels like failure. It kills trust.
Fix it:
If you don’t guide the user through what’s happening, they’ll assume it’s broken, and they’ll leave.
There are a few teams getting it right, not by simplifying the tech, but by putting user experience first. They’re proving that Web3 doesn’t have to feel like solving a puzzle.
Here’s how they’re doing it.
Uniswap strips everything down to a single screen.
No mandatory logins. No clutter. Just:
Every button is where you'd expect. Every action gives instant feedback. You only connect your wallet when you actually need to. That alone removes half the friction most DeFi platforms add by default.
What to learn:
If you’re building a product around transactions, don’t interrupt flow. Let users interact first, then confirm with crypto.
Farcaster made the bold move: onboarding like a Web2 app.
They don’t force wallet connections upfront. You can get inside, look around, start following people. By the time you connect, you already feel invested.
What to learn:
Emotional momentum matters. Don’t waste it asking users to do things they don’t yet understand.
Zora turns minting into an experience, not just a transaction.
Instead of focusing on the tech (ERC-721, contract types), it focuses on how the creator feels. Zora understands that good UX makes minting feel meaningful, not mechanical.
What to learn:
NFT products aren’t just about ownership, they’re about expression. Treat the minting experience like you're curating an exhibition.
Lens reimagines what a profile looks like in a decentralized world.
But here’s the key: they don’t explain this upfront. You only learn it when it matters. To a new user, Lens just feels like a smoother, cleaner version of Twitter.
What to learn:
You don’t need to teach users the protocol upfront. Let the value show through intuitive flows.
You’re not just designing a screen. You’re designing trust in a system most people don’t understand yet.
In Web3, every confusing moment is an exit point.
Trust doesn’t come from aesthetics. It comes from clarity, timing, and giving users control.
When someone connects their wallet, signs a message, or mints an NFT, they’re putting their assets on the line. They need to feel safe doing it. That’s not just UX. That’s onboarding a new mental model.
Design for confidence, not clicks.
If they don’t trust the interface, they won’t trust the system. And if they don’t trust the system, they’ll never stick around long enough to care about decentralization.
In Web3, good design isn’t a nice-to-have, it’s the difference between a user staying or bouncing, trusting or doubting, returning or forgetting. UI and UX are how users first experience your values, your intentions, and your product’s promise.
When that experience is confusing, cold, or poorly timed, it undermines everything else you’ve built no matter how innovative the tech behind it is.
Design in Web3 is about more than screens and flows. It’s about bridging the mental gap between traditional digital habits and a decentralized future.
As builders, we need to stop designing for insiders and start designing for everyone else, the curious, the cautious, the ones on the edge of adoption. Because the future of Web3 won’t be won by protocols alone. It’ll be won by products that feel clear, safe, and human from the very first click.
Just like you, we are also looking for partners who would like to work with us. We want to be your team, part of your team and much more. Take that leap and fill in this form or email us.